Paragard IUD Lawsuit in Michigan (Device Breakage Claims)
Information for Michigan residents researching Paragard IUD lawsuits: MDL-2974 status, allegations the device breaks on removal, eligibility, evidence, and Michigan filing deadlines.
This guide is for general information only. It does not provide legal advice, does not create an attorney-client relationship, and case status can change.
What Michigan residents should know
Michigan residents with Paragard claims are generally not limited to Michigan state court. Most federal cases are transferred into the multidistrict litigation, MDL-2974, before Judge Leigh Martin May in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, which held about 4,071 pending cases as of June 1, 2026.
Michigan law still matters: the state's filing deadline, discovery rule, damages rules, and procedural law can shape an individual claim even when the case is litigated in the MDL.
What Michigan residents should know about the Paragard lawsuits
Cases filed by Michigan residents in federal court are transferred into MDL-2974 before Judge Leigh Martin May in the Northern District of Georgia, where about 4,071 cases were pending as of June 1, 2026. The first bellwether trial ended in a defense verdict for Teva in February 2026, and additional bellwether trials are scheduled in 2026; no global settlement exists.
Michigan’s personal injury deadline is 3 years (Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5805(2)). Because a broken Paragard is often discovered only when the device fractures during removal, accrual and discovery-rule questions can be important. Michigan applies limited discovery-based accrual rules; latent-injury treatment varies by claim type. A lawyer can confirm how the deadline applies to a specific Michigan claim.
Sources: U.S. District Court, N.D. Ga. — MDL-2974 (Paragard) case page; Law.com (Daily Report) — first Paragard bellwether defense verdict (Feb. 2026); JPML — pending MDL dockets.
Possible eligibility factors
- A Paragard copper IUD used by Michigan residents that broke or fractured during removal.
- Records identifying the device as Paragard and an operative note describing the breakage.
- Documentation of retained fragments, migration, or surgery to remove them.
- Filing within the deadline that applies to the claim under Michigan law.
How Michigan claims proceed
Most Michigan Paragard cases are filed in or transferred to MDL-2974 in the Northern District of Georgia for coordinated proceedings. The first bellwether trial ended in a defense verdict for Teva in February 2026, and additional bellwether trials are scheduled in 2026; no global settlement exists. Michigan's personal injury limitations period is 3 years (Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5805(2)), but accrual and discovery-rule questions can be fact-specific when breakage is discovered at the time of removal.
What records support Paragard claims in Michigan?
- Medical records related to diagnosis, treatment, and symptoms.
- Records showing use of, prescription for, or exposure to the product or substance involved.
- Pharmacy, clinic, employment, military, agricultural, or exposure records where relevant.
- Photos, receipts, dental invoices, pathology reports, or specialist records if applicable.
What exposure and legal context matter in Michigan?
Michigan residents may have had a Paragard copper IUD that broke during removal, leaving fragments that required imaging or additional procedures to remove.
Where are Michigan Paragard cases handled?
Living in Michigan does not necessarily mean the case will be filed only in Michigan. Claims may be evaluated by national firms, filed in federal court, coordinated through MDL proceedings, or handled through another legal process.
Federal courts in Michigan
- Eastern District of Michigan
- Western District of Michigan
What is the filing deadline for Paragard lawsuits in Michigan?
For a Michigan resident researching Paragard claims, the starting point is usually Michigan's general personal injury period: 3 years under Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5805(2). That is only a starting point, not a final legal deadline for every person.
The real filing deadline can depend on diagnosis date, when the injury and possible cause were discovered, exposure location, wrongful-death issues, prior claim paperwork, and whether the case is filed directly, transferred to an MDL, or handled through another process.
Discovery-rule note: Michigan applies limited discovery-based accrual rules; latent-injury treatment varies by claim type.
How long do Michigan residents have to file?
Michigan's personal injury statute of limitations applicable to product liability claims is 3 years (Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5805(2)). Accrual timing, tolling, and repose periods can still change the real deadline in an individual case.
- Filing period: 3 years — Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5805(2).
- Discovery rule: Michigan applies limited discovery-based accrual rules; latent-injury treatment varies by claim type.
Because the controlling deadline depends on diagnosis date, discovery facts, exposure history, wrongful-death rules, and how the claim is filed, only a licensed attorney can confirm the deadline that applies to a specific situation. This page is general legal information, not legal advice.
What should Michigan residents ask a lawyer?
- Are you currently reviewing Paragard IUD claims?
- What records do you need to evaluate my claim?
- How do Michigan filing deadlines affect my situation?
- Would my claim be handled locally, nationally, or through an MDL?
- Do you work directly on this case or refer it to another firm?
- Are there upfront costs?
Frequently Asked Questions
Where are Michigan Paragard cases handled?
Federal Paragard cases filed by Michigan residents are transferred into MDL-2974 in the Northern District of Georgia before Judge Leigh Martin May. Michigan's personal injury deadline is 3 years (Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5805(2)); because breakage is often discovered at removal, a lawyer can confirm how the deadline applies.
What is the Paragard lawsuit in Michigan about?
Lawsuits allege the Paragard copper IUD can break during removal, leaving fragments that may require surgery, and that the makers failed to warn. Michigan residents' federal cases are generally transferred into MDL-2974 in the Northern District of Georgia. Teva and CooperSurgical dispute the allegations.
Can a Michigan resident file a Paragard lawsuit?
Possibly. Michigan residents whose Paragard IUD broke on removal, with records documenting the breakage and any follow-up procedures, may be able to file in federal court (transferred into MDL-2974). Whether a claim qualifies depends on the device records, injury, timing, and Michigan law.
What is the statute of limitations for a Michigan Paragard claim?
Michigan's personal injury period is 3 years (Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5805(2)). Michigan applies limited discovery-based accrual rules; latent-injury treatment varies by claim type. Only a lawyer can confirm the deadline for a specific situation.
What records matter most for a Michigan claim?
Insertion and removal records, anything identifying the device as Paragard, the operative report describing the breakage, imaging locating retained fragments, and records of any surgery to remove them are commonly requested first.
Has there been a Paragard settlement?
No. There is no global settlement, and the first bellwether trial ended in a defense verdict for Teva in February 2026. Additional bellwether trials are scheduled in 2026, and no amount is guaranteed for any individual claim.
Is Paragard still on the market?
Yes. Paragard remains an FDA-approved copper IUD that is still marketed. The lawsuits concern alleged breakage on removal and warnings, not a market withdrawal. Contraception decisions belong with a healthcare professional.
Does this page provide legal advice?
No. This page is general legal information for research purposes only and does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Other Lawsuit Guides in Michigan
AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit in Michigan
Active / Investigating
Camp Lejeune Claims for Michigan Residents
Active — Filing Deadline Passed
Depo-Provera Lawsuit in Michigan
Active / Investigating
Ozempic Lawsuit in Michigan (GLP-1 Claims)
Active / Investigating
Paraquat Parkinson's Lawsuit in Michigan
Active / Investigating
Roundup Cancer Lawsuit in Michigan
Active / Investigating
Social Media Lawsuit in Michigan (Teen Mental-Health Claims)
Active / Investigating
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit in Michigan
Active / Investigating
Talcum Powder Lawsuit in Michigan (Ovarian Cancer & Mesothelioma)
Active / Investigating
Sources and Update Log
- Last reviewed
- June 29, 2026
- Last updated
- June 29, 2026
Sources reviewed may include court filings, MDL notices, public agency materials, manufacturer disclosures, and law firm case-status updates where applicable.
Recent updates focus on lawsuit status, state-specific context, eligibility factors, records, deadlines, and editorial disclosures.