Paragard IUD Lawsuit in Pennsylvania (Device Breakage Claims)
Information for Pennsylvania residents researching Paragard IUD lawsuits: MDL-2974 status, allegations the device breaks on removal, eligibility, evidence, and Pennsylvania filing deadlines.
This guide is for general information only. It does not provide legal advice, does not create an attorney-client relationship, and case status can change.
What Pennsylvania residents should know
Pennsylvania residents with Paragard claims are generally not limited to Pennsylvania state court. Most federal cases are transferred into the multidistrict litigation, MDL-2974, before Judge Leigh Martin May in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, which held about 4,071 pending cases as of June 1, 2026.
Pennsylvania law still matters: the state's filing deadline, discovery rule, damages rules, and procedural law can shape an individual claim even when the case is litigated in the MDL.
What Pennsylvania residents should know about the Paragard lawsuits
Cases filed by Pennsylvania residents in federal court are transferred into MDL-2974 before Judge Leigh Martin May in the Northern District of Georgia, where about 4,071 cases were pending as of June 1, 2026. The first bellwether trial ended in a defense verdict for Teva in February 2026, and additional bellwether trials are scheduled in 2026; no global settlement exists.
Pennsylvania’s personal injury deadline is 2 years (42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5524). Because a broken Paragard is often discovered only when the device fractures during removal, accrual and discovery-rule questions can be important. Pennsylvania applies a discovery rule that can delay accrual until the injury and its cause reasonably could have been discovered. A lawyer can confirm how the deadline applies to a specific Pennsylvania claim.
Sources: U.S. District Court, N.D. Ga. — MDL-2974 (Paragard) case page; Law.com (Daily Report) — first Paragard bellwether defense verdict (Feb. 2026); JPML — pending MDL dockets.
Possible eligibility factors
- A Paragard copper IUD used by Pennsylvania residents that broke or fractured during removal.
- Records identifying the device as Paragard and an operative note describing the breakage.
- Documentation of retained fragments, migration, or surgery to remove them.
- Filing within the deadline that applies to the claim under Pennsylvania law.
How Pennsylvania claims proceed
Most Pennsylvania Paragard cases are filed in or transferred to MDL-2974 in the Northern District of Georgia for coordinated proceedings. The first bellwether trial ended in a defense verdict for Teva in February 2026, and additional bellwether trials are scheduled in 2026; no global settlement exists. Pennsylvania's personal injury limitations period is 2 years (42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5524), but accrual and discovery-rule questions can be fact-specific when breakage is discovered at the time of removal.
What records support Paragard claims in Pennsylvania?
- Medical records related to diagnosis, treatment, and symptoms.
- Records showing use of, prescription for, or exposure to the product or substance involved.
- Pharmacy, clinic, employment, military, agricultural, or exposure records where relevant.
- Photos, receipts, dental invoices, pathology reports, or specialist records if applicable.
What exposure and legal context matter in Pennsylvania?
Pennsylvania residents may have had a Paragard copper IUD that broke during removal, leaving fragments that required imaging or additional procedures to remove.
Where are Pennsylvania Paragard cases handled?
Living in Pennsylvania does not necessarily mean the case will be filed only in Pennsylvania. Claims may be evaluated by national firms, filed in federal court, coordinated through MDL proceedings, or handled through another legal process.
Federal courts in Pennsylvania
- Eastern District of Pennsylvania
- Middle District of Pennsylvania
- Western District of Pennsylvania
What is the filing deadline for Paragard lawsuits in Pennsylvania?
For a Pennsylvania resident researching Paragard claims, the starting point is usually Pennsylvania's general personal injury period: 2 years under 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5524. That is only a starting point, not a final legal deadline for every person.
The real filing deadline can depend on diagnosis date, when the injury and possible cause were discovered, exposure location, wrongful-death issues, prior claim paperwork, and whether the case is filed directly, transferred to an MDL, or handled through another process.
Discovery-rule note: Pennsylvania applies a discovery rule that can delay accrual until the injury and its cause reasonably could have been discovered.
How long do Pennsylvania residents have to file?
Pennsylvania's personal injury statute of limitations applicable to product liability claims is 2 years (42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5524). Accrual timing, tolling, and repose periods can still change the real deadline in an individual case.
- Filing period: 2 years — 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5524.
- Discovery rule: Pennsylvania applies a discovery rule that can delay accrual until the injury and its cause reasonably could have been discovered.
Because the controlling deadline depends on diagnosis date, discovery facts, exposure history, wrongful-death rules, and how the claim is filed, only a licensed attorney can confirm the deadline that applies to a specific situation. This page is general legal information, not legal advice.
What should Pennsylvania residents ask a lawyer?
- Are you currently reviewing Paragard IUD claims?
- What records do you need to evaluate my claim?
- How do Pennsylvania filing deadlines affect my situation?
- Would my claim be handled locally, nationally, or through an MDL?
- Do you work directly on this case or refer it to another firm?
- Are there upfront costs?
Frequently Asked Questions
Where are Pennsylvania Paragard cases handled?
Federal Paragard cases filed by Pennsylvania residents are transferred into MDL-2974 in the Northern District of Georgia before Judge Leigh Martin May. Pennsylvania's personal injury deadline is 2 years (42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5524); because breakage is often discovered at removal, a lawyer can confirm how the deadline applies.
What is the Paragard lawsuit in Pennsylvania about?
Lawsuits allege the Paragard copper IUD can break during removal, leaving fragments that may require surgery, and that the makers failed to warn. Pennsylvania residents' federal cases are generally transferred into MDL-2974 in the Northern District of Georgia. Teva and CooperSurgical dispute the allegations.
Can a Pennsylvania resident file a Paragard lawsuit?
Possibly. Pennsylvania residents whose Paragard IUD broke on removal, with records documenting the breakage and any follow-up procedures, may be able to file in federal court (transferred into MDL-2974). Whether a claim qualifies depends on the device records, injury, timing, and Pennsylvania law.
What is the statute of limitations for a Pennsylvania Paragard claim?
Pennsylvania's personal injury period is 2 years (42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5524). Pennsylvania applies a discovery rule that can delay accrual until the injury and its cause reasonably could have been discovered. Only a lawyer can confirm the deadline for a specific situation.
What records matter most for a Pennsylvania claim?
Insertion and removal records, anything identifying the device as Paragard, the operative report describing the breakage, imaging locating retained fragments, and records of any surgery to remove them are commonly requested first.
Has there been a Paragard settlement?
No. There is no global settlement, and the first bellwether trial ended in a defense verdict for Teva in February 2026. Additional bellwether trials are scheduled in 2026, and no amount is guaranteed for any individual claim.
Is Paragard still on the market?
Yes. Paragard remains an FDA-approved copper IUD that is still marketed. The lawsuits concern alleged breakage on removal and warnings, not a market withdrawal. Contraception decisions belong with a healthcare professional.
Does this page provide legal advice?
No. This page is general legal information for research purposes only and does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Other Lawsuit Guides in Pennsylvania
AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit in Pennsylvania
Active / Investigating
Camp Lejeune Claims for Pennsylvania Residents
Active — Filing Deadline Passed
Depo-Provera Lawsuit in Pennsylvania
Active / Investigating
Ozempic Lawsuit in Pennsylvania (GLP-1 Claims)
Active / Investigating
Paraquat Parkinson's Lawsuit in Pennsylvania
Active / Investigating
Roundup Cancer Lawsuit in Pennsylvania
Active / Investigating
Social Media Lawsuit in Pennsylvania (Teen Mental-Health Claims)
Active / Investigating
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit in Pennsylvania
Active / Investigating
Talcum Powder Lawsuit in Pennsylvania (Ovarian Cancer & Mesothelioma)
Active / Investigating
Sources and Update Log
- Last reviewed
- June 29, 2026
- Last updated
- June 29, 2026
Sources reviewed may include court filings, MDL notices, public agency materials, manufacturer disclosures, and law firm case-status updates where applicable.
Recent updates focus on lawsuit status, state-specific context, eligibility factors, records, deadlines, and editorial disclosures.